Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Trees And Forest.net

All my blog posts along with my portfolio can be found at www.treesandforest.net

robert graup

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Liquid branding: Tapping into an old need with the newest technology

"A man of wisdom delights in water."
~ Confucius

"The river has taught me to listen; you will learn from it, too.
The river knows everything; one can learn everything from it." 
~ Herman Hesse, Siddhartha

"Sometimes, if you stand on the bottom rail of a bridge and lean over
to watch the river slipping slowly away beneath you,
you will suddenly know everything there is to be known."
~ A.A. Milne, Winnie the Pooh
Recently I've noticed that a lot of video content, especially TV commercials, are using computer generated liquid. Sinuous, mesmorizing, flowing liquid. Below is a montage of various recent ads (Apple Gold iPhone, Benjamin Moore, Fage yogurt, Frey chocolate, Renauge brandy, Valspar paint, Fonterra Whole water) showing how realistic CG liquid has become (or the combo of CG plus real stuff).


Now, computer generated water has been a big part of movies, from the living column of water in 1989's The Abyss to Ang Lee's combination of a 1.7 million gallon water tank and CGI water in 2012's The Life of Pi.
I wondered what was driving this usage of CGI in advertising. Turns out that it is due, in part, to technological advancements that are allowing imagination to become reality: a combination of more efficient and powerful hardware and software. All at a increasingly lower price that fits with the average $280,000 product cost for a TV commercial (2011) versus the $120MM Life of Pi.

But the bigger driver is simply based on a human truth: there's something about nature, particularly water, that soothes us and connects us to the world. And it's that something that advertisers need to connect their brands to people. 

Famed biologist E.O. Wilson theorized that our connectedness to nature has an evolutionary bent: we are “hard-wired” to seek out features and attributes of nature, like light and water, which are beneficial to survival.

Researchers Rachel Kaplan and Stephen Kaplan posit that there are four reasons why nature aids human functioning:
  1. In the natural world we have a sense of "being away" from the day-to-day stresses and strains of life.
  2. Being in nature helps us to put matters in perspective.
  3. The natural world "fascinates" us, stimulating our senses.
  4. Being in nature makes people feel that they are in a supportive and harmonious environment. 
These claims have actually been tested and it appears that nature is indeed empirically restorative.
    For example, a study following children as they moved homes over a number of years found that those who had increased views of nature had an increase in their ability to focus.  Similarly, a study by Kaplan (1995) found that simply showing people pictures of nature versus an urban setting restored their ability to concentrate.

    A 1984 study by Ulrich showed that hospital patients who could see a natural scene through their hospital window (as opposed to a brick wall) were discharged more quickly, needed less painkilling drugs and were generally deemed to be more cooperative. A 1991 study by the same researcher showed that when a person is under stress, recovery is faster and more complete after exposure to natural versus urban settings.   

    Water, in particular, has the ability to soothe the soul. It can be tranquil or raging, furious, calm, soothing, hard or soft. Full of wonder. Any emotion can be reflected or caused by water.
    Since ancient times the sound of flowing water has been attributed a measure of tranquility.  Many CDs for meditation include the sounds of water – a babbling brook, the patter of rain, or the waves crashing on the seashore – that can calm us or lull us to sleep. 

    As Sarah Allen of Clarkson University (2002) puts it:
    "There is something incredibly relaxing about the rhythmic yet not-rhythmic sound that falling water beats out in its chaos-driven path, falling down dips into itself, rolling and breaking over itself, swirling and spiraling with itself.  In smaller, calmer trickles, the sounds are light and musical, reminiscent of flutes and small bells, or even of birdsong: high-pitched and twittering, wavering as the flows path….(T)he sound of quantities or water falling or great waves breaking has a pulse to it, as though some great heart beats out in the center of it all where no man sails, and drives the rhythm that the waves and falls beat out. The rhythm is just a little faster than the calmed human pulse, feeling as though every beat comes just a little sooner than it should, pressing the soul towards anticipation, inducing a sort of quiet excitement that is heady and seductive even as it soothes.  Yes, even such drumbeats as the run-together beatings of a falls against its basin can be described as soothing, for there is always a cool connotation associated with the sound of water, be it white noise or woodwinds – possibly a link between the feel of it passing over the skin or the breeze coming off of it, bearing spray or just the coolness into our faces, onto our clothes and along our skin.  This coolness and the tranquilizing rhythm with which it laps up against the extended hand, a submerged torso, in time with its music, lulls and massages both the mind and the body into a transcendental, philosophical, quiet state."
    Jim Thacker similarly describes the qualities of CGI water, writing in 3DWorld Magazine, "There’s something about digitally simulated water that always quickens the pulse. Perhaps it’s the way in which it moves: the sinuous underlying flow breaking up into a ballet of drips and splashes. Perhaps it’s the complexity of the mathematics that generate it: the Navier-Stokes equations that describe the motion of fluids, and the computational methods used to bring them to the screen – techniques with excitingly chunky names like smoothed particle hydrodynamics and PIC/FLIP simulation. Or perhaps it’s the sheer visceral thrill of seeing millions of tonnes of water crashing down around you. Whatever the reason – and whatever else you think of Roland Emmerich’s movies – the sight of vast tidal waves poised and ready to overwhelm the White House never fails to bring a tear to the eye (a digitally simulated tear, of course).

    In one study on water (Thoma, 2013), researchers played either classical choral music, sounds of rippling water, or nothing at all for three groups of subjects before making them speak and do arithmetic in front of an audience. Those who listened to the water before performing stayed the calmest, producing the lowest amount of the stress hormone cortisol.

    Thus, it's not surprising then that brands are using the newest technology to tap into one of our oldest needs: to connect to water.


    The water understands
    Civilization well;
    It wets my foot, but prettily,
    It chills my life, but wittily,
    It is not disconcerted,
    It is not broken-hearted:
    Well used, it decketh joy,
    Adorneth, doubleth joy:
    Ill used, it will destroy
    In perfect time and measure
    With a face of golden pleasure
    Elegantly destroy.

    Ralph Waldo Emerson

    Additional Sources:

    Arbor, A. (2008). "Going Outside Even in the Cold Improves Memory, Attention." University of Michigan News Service.

    Berman, M., Jonides, J., and Kaplan, S. (2008). "The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature." Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207-1212.

    Burmil, S., Daniel, T. C., and Hetherington, J. D. (1999). Human Values and Perceptions of Water in Arid Landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 44(2), 99-109.

    Burns, G. (2005). "Naturally Happy, Naturally Healthy: The Role of the Natural Environment in Well-being." in Huppert, F. A., Baylis, N., and Keverne, B., The Science of Well-being, Oxford University Press.

    Frumkin, H., (2001) "Beyond Toxicity: Human Health and the Natural Environment." American Journal of Preventive Medicine 20.3: 234-240.

    Greenway, R. (1995). "The Wilderness Effect and Ecopsychology." in Roszak et al, Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, Healing the Mind, Sierra Club Books, 122-135.

    Hartig, T., Mang, M., and Evans, G.  (1991). "Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences." Environment and Behavior 23(1): 3-26.

    Herzog, T., et al.  (1997). "Reflection and Attentional Recovery as Distinctive Benefits of Restorative Environments." Journal of Environmental Psychology 17: 165-170.

    Herzog, T., Chen, H., and Primeau, J. (2002). "Perception of the Restorative Potential of Natural and Other Settings." Journal of Environmental Psychology 22: 295-306.

    Howell, A., Dopko, R., Passmore, H., and Buro, K. (2011). "Nature Connectedness: Associations with Well-being and Mindfulness." Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166-171.

    Kaplan, S. (1995). "The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework." Journal of Environmental Psychology 15: 169-182.

    Kaplan, S. (2001). "Meditation, Restoration, and the Management of Mental Fatigue." Environment and Behavior 33(4): 480-506.

    Kellert, S. R., and Wilson, E. O. (Eds.). (1995). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press.

    Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., and Mador, M. (2011). Biophilic Design: the Theory, Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. John Wiley & Sons.

    Kuo, F., and Sullivan, W. (2001). "Environment and Crime in the Inner City Does Vegetation Reduce Crime?" Environment and Behavior, 33(3), 343-367.

    Laumann, K., Garling, T., and Stormark, K.  (2001). "Rating Scale Measures of Restorative Components of Environments." Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 31-44.

    Lidwell, W., Holden, K., and Butler, J. (2010). Universal Principles of Design: Baby-Face Bias, Biophilia Effect, Cathedral Effect and Chunking, Rockport Publishers.

    Mayer, F,, Frantz, C., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., and Dolliver, K. (2009). "Why is Nature Beneficial? The Role of Connectedness to Nature." Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607-643.

    Mitchell, R., and Popham, F. (2008). "Effect of Exposure to Natural Environment on Health Inequalities: An Observational Population Study." The Lancet, 372(9650), 1655-1660.

    Nisbet, E., Zelenski, J., and Murphy, S. (2011) "Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-being." Journal of Happiness Studies 12, 303-22.

    Nisbet, E., Zelenski, J., and Murphy, S. (2009) "The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking individuals’ Connection with Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior." Environment and Behavior, 41, 715-740.

    Pradhan, P. (2012). The Role of Water as a Restorative Component in Small Urban Spaces,"  Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

    Taylor, A., Wiley, A., Kuo, F., and Sullivan, W. (1998). "Growing Up in the Inner City: Green Spaces as Places to Grow." Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 3-27.

    Thoma, M., et al.  (2013) "The Effect of Music on the Human Stress Response." PLoS ONE 8(8): e70156.

    Ulrich, R., Simons, R., Losito, B,, Fiorito, E., Miles, M., and Zelson, M. (1991). "Stress Recovery During Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments." Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230.

    Ulrich, R. (1984). "View Through a Window May Influence Recovery From Surgery." Science, 224(4647), 420-421.

    Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.

    robert graup

    Wednesday, September 25, 2013

    Apple. The Revolutionary has won. Long live the King.

    "Macintosh was leading a revolution...taking the power away from big business and big government and putting it in the hands of people. You've got to understand that was the rallying cry in the hallways of Apple. Computing had been held by a close-knit elite, and we were going to bust up the cabal and give the power to the people."                        Steve Hayden, 1994

    In many ways the introduction of the Apple Macintosh computer wasn't just a revolution. It represented an enormous change of mindset, as consumers were transformed into revolutionaries and ultimately into masters of technology. The beginnings of this transformation predate the introduction of the first Apple computer on April 11, 1976, and didn't end when the Macintosh was released on January 24, 1984.

    Like many revolutions, the conflict was secondary to what followed.

    Modern computers date from World War II, but in the post war years, only governmental agencies and large companies could afford the huge machines.  For example, the world's first mass-produced computer, the IBM 650, cost a half a million dollars when it was introduced in 1953 (that's about $4.3M today).

    Because of this expense, this exclusivity, the computer at this time came under attack as a symbol of large, centralized, bureaucratic institutions.

    The computer technologies that we take for granted today actually owe their shape to the following decade, an unruly period which was defined by protest, experimentation with drugs, counter-cultural community, and a general sense of anarchic idealism. In fact, as Stewart Brand has argued in his essay We Owe It All to the Hippies, the 1960's "counterculture's scorn for centralized authority provided the philosophical foundations of not only the leaderless Internet but also the entire personal-computer revolution." (Stewart is more widely known as the founder of the Whole Earth Catalog.)

    In this milieu, Stephen Wozniak and Steve Jobs designed their first computer as a technology to share with other members of the Homebrew Computer Club, a computer hobbyist group in Silicon Valley (first meeting, March 1975).  As Wozniak puts it, the Apple I was "meant to bring down to the club and put on the table during the random access period and demonstrate: Look at this, it uses very few chips....There was a lot of showing off to other members of the club. Schematics of the Apple I were passed around freely, and I'd even go over to people's houses and help them build their own."

    Later, Jobs convinced Wozniak that they could sell the computer and found a willing partner in Paul Terrell who owned the nearby Byte Shop in Menlo Park.  Terrell ordered 50 of the computers, though the "computer" sold would be unrecognizable to us today.  For $666.66 (roughly $2800 in 2013 dollars), buyers received just a blank printed circuit board, parts kit, and 16-page assembly manual. No power supply, keyboard, mouse, monitor or hard drive.

    In 1976 Apple's revenues were $175,000 (that's about 260 computers worth).

    The company was officially incorporated on January 3, 1977.  Mike Markkula, an early investor, wrote the company's first principles in a one-page paper called “The Apple Marketing Philosophy.”
    ¡Viva la Revolución! 

    Apple continued to release new computers, including the more complete Apple II in 1977 and Lisa in 1983, the first commercial computer with a graphical user interface (GUI).  But it wasn't until January 22, 1984 that the revolution begun in 1976 really took flight.

    On that day, the Washington Redskins beat the Los Angeles Raiders to win Super Bowl XVIII by the score of 38-9.  But during the third quarter of the game, Apple ran its infamous "1984" TV commercial and we saw why 1984 would not be like "1984."


    The :60 spot was created by Steve Hayden, Lee Clow and Brent Thomas of Chiat/Day in LA and directed by Ridley Scott (of Blade Runner fame), with credit to Gary Gussick and Mike Moser in the San Francisco office who wrote an earlier print concept for the Apple II with the headline, “Why 1984 won’t be like 1984.” 

    The subsequent newspaper and magazine ads focused on how the Macintosh was a computer, "For the rest of us"; as opposed to those large institutional computers as well as the IBM PC which had been introduced on August 12, 1981.

    "It was the Macintosh," Steve Wozniak wrote, "that became our flagship machine and spoke to the masses. It carried a message that you didn't have to think linearly and you didn't have to keep computer gibberish in your head. The Mac was the first personal computer with a mouse and menus and windows, not to mention networking and LaserWriters. Files could even be named as humans would name them. We revived the dream of people mastering technology."

    In 1985, after a power struggle with the board of directors Jobs left Apple. But in 1996, he returned to the company and asked a number of agencies for new advertising ideas.  Lee Clow and Chiat/Day, the Macintosh crew, was one of them. According to Ken Segall, one of the creatives who worked on the pitch, their big idea came "when we stepped back and realized that the spark driving Apple existed long before Apple. In fact, it existed long before electricity. The ability to think creatively is one of the great catalysts of civilization. So the logic seemed natural: why not show what kind of company Apple is by celebrating the people Apple admires? Let’s acknowledge the most remarkable people – past and present – who “change things” and “push the human race forward.”

    On August 3, 1997, Clow presented a new slogan (writen by Craig Tanimoto) and aesthetic for Apple’s ads: Think Different (a reference to IBM’s famous “THINK” slogan). Later, Creative Director Rob Siltanen, with tweaks from Segall, created the famous "Crazy Ones" spot with the lines:

    Here’s to the crazy ones.
    The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers.
    The round pegs in the square holes.
    The ones who see things differently.
    They’re not fond of rules.
    And they have no respect for the status quo.
    You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them.
    About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them.
    Because they change things.
    They push the human race forward.
    And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.
    Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.
    Think different.


    Steve Jobs explained the idea this way to his employees: "What we’re about isn’t making boxes for people to get their jobs done, although we do that well. We do that better than almost anybody, in some cases. But Apple is about something more than that. Apple at the core…is that we believe that people with passion can change the world for the better. That’s what we believe".

    Later, in 2006, Apple tweaked Microsoft with a humorous series of “Get a Mac” ads that featured actor Justin Long as a hip, easygoing Mac showing up a fussy, formal PC played by John Hodgman. The 66-ad campaign ran from May 2006 to October 2009.


    In "How David Beats Goliath," Malcolm Gladwell discusses an undersized, under-talented girl’s basketball team of twelve year olds. The coach, a complete novice of the game, had to develop a strategy that could give his underdogs the best chance of winning. Like the story of David and Goliath, the coach decided that the only way the team could win was through an unconventional attack: a full court press that didn’t play by Goliath’s rules

    And once David held the advantage, he pressed. "That's what Davids do when they want to beat Goliaths," Gladwell writes.  "This is the second half of the insurgent's creed. Insurgents work harder than Goliath. But their other advantage is that they will do what is "socially horrifying"—they will challenge the conventions about how battles are supposed to be fought."  Using this strategy, the underdog girls basketball team had remarkable success.

    Turns out, we love underdogs; the crazy ones.

    A series of studies conducted at the University of South Florida, titled "The Appeal of the Underdog," suggests a number of possible reasons. First is because of a natural human "aversion to inequality." We see underdogs as being in a disadvantaged position, and we throw our support behind them as a way of rebalancing equality and fairness.

    Second, we attribute greater effort to underdogs. In the face of terrible odds, they persevere. Seeing the underdog, we empathize with their plight and their effort. Their chance to win becomes our chance to win.

    Apple's revolution was the underdog's revolution.  In the seventies, the battle was against faceless, powerful bureaucratic institutions. In the eighties, the dark controlling force was IBM, while in the nineties it became Microsoft and Bill Gates.

    In 1975, less than 50,000 personal computers were sold in the US.  Technology analyst group Forrester estimates that there will be more than two billion personal computers in use by 2015.  About 65% of US households have a PC.
    In 2004, IBM sold its PC division to China-based Lenovo Group.
    On August 20, 2012, Apple became the most valuable company in American history surpassing Microsoft.  To which Forbes Magazine asked, "Is Microsoft irrelevant?"
    The Apple revolution, it appears, is over.  The bad guys vanquished.  The good guys win.

    Social movements, like Apple's, are difficult to maintain.  The historical record shows that they either fail or disappear.  In fact, once a movement succeeds, there is really no longer a need for that movement.

    So, now that Apple has succeeded, what does it do?

    What Apple has chosen to do is to launch a new brand campaign around the line, "Designed By Apple in California.”  The copy reads:
    "This is it. This is what matters. The experience of a product. How it makes someone feel. When you start by imagining. What that might be like, You step back. You think. Who will this help? Will it make life better? Does this deserve to exist? If you are busy making everything, How can you perfect anything? We don't believe in coincidence. Or dumb luck. There are thousands "no's" For every "yes." We spend a lot of time on a few great things. Until every idea we touch enhances each life it touches. We're engineers and artists. Craftsmen and inventors. We sign our work. You may rarely look at it. But you'll always feel it. This is our signature. And it means everything. Designed by Apple in

    In reviewing the ad, Adweek says: "The visuals are quietly grand yet intimate. But the copy feels disjointed. The word "product," which I don't recall Apple ever having used in a commercial before, is deflating—almost a faux pas. The line "Does it deserve to exist?" is odd, too—a needlessly complex thought in what's supposed to be a simpler meditation. And as for the line "You may rarely look at it, but you'll always feel it"—isn't it more true that we stare at these products relentlessly, often without feeling anything at all?  Then there's the tagline, asserting that this global company is still somehow local. It comes out of nowhere, and is jarring against the rest of the copy, which is about being universal.  "Words mean a great deal to us," Tim Cook said on Monday. Here, though, they fail to do the trick. It's clear what Apple wanted to "craft around its intention" with these ads. But you don't really feel it. They aim for poetry in the classic Apple style. But maybe it really isn't the same company after all."

    "Maybe it really isn't the same company after all."

    In a large sense, Apple isn't the same company.  It's now mature, not scrappy.  Mainstream, not cult-like.  Its guiding founder, Steve Jobs, no longer at the helm. Instead we have Tim Cook.

    The difference between the two, DailyTech writes, is that "Jobs was temperamental, and wasn't afraid to jump down someone's throat and scream if they did something wrong. He was passionate and very involved in the creation of each product. This passion and drive led Apple to have a cult following, where Apple fans would wait outside of retail stores waiting for a new iPhone to be released. Cook, on the other hand, is quiet and laid back. He delegates orders, and is known to sit quietly in meetings with his hands folded in front of him."

    "Here's to the warm and cuddly ones," states CNET.

    In Hey Whipple, Squeeze This!, copywriter Luke Sullivan asserts that "Steven Jobs and Apple have been telling the same great story ever since they aired their famous “1984” Super Bowl spot; a story first told in a line of copy from one of their early print ads: “Instead of teaching people more about computers, we taught computers more about people.” Mac’s are designed around the way we work, not the way manufactures of PC’s work. Mac’s are the “computer for the rest of us.”

    However, with these new "Designed by Apple" ads, Ken Segall (of "Think Different" fame) points out a glaring departure from Apple’s past story: "Never in Apple’s history has it suggested that you should buy a product because “everyone’s doing it.” Apple has always demonstrated concrete benefits: simplicity, design, elegance and just plain lustworthiness. You should buy a Mac because it’s better. How things change. Apple is now a world-leading mass marketer, and ubiquity is a positive selling point—even if in the past it was an indicator of mediocrity."

    Perhaps this story change will prove the right path for Apple. Or perhaps Apple is now Goliath.


    “Don’t let the noise of others’ opinions drown out your own inner voice.
    And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition.
    They somehow already know what you truly want to become.”
    ~ Steve Jobs (Feb. 24, 1955 - Oct. 5, 2011)

    • Asbury, N., "Long copy isn't back," Creative Review, July 2, 2013.
    • Benford, R., and David A. Snow. "Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment." Annual review of sociology, (2000): 611-639.
    • Blumer, Herbert. "Social movements." Studies in social movements: A social psychological perspective (1969): 8-29.
      Bowers, J., and Ochs, J., The rhetoric of agitation and control. Addison-Wesley, l980.
    • Boyer, Paul S. The enduring vision. Cengage Learning, 2013.
    • Brand, Stewart. "We owe it all to the hippies. Forget antiwar protests, Woodstock, even long hair. The real legacy of the sixties generation is the computer revolution." Time magazine, 145: 12, 1995.
    • Caniglia, B. and Carmin, J., "Scholarship on social movement organziations: classic views and emerging trends." Mobilization: an international quarterly, 10.2 (2005): 201-212.
    • Dormehl, L., The Apple revolution: Steve Jobs, the counterculture and how the crazy ones took over the world. Virgin Digital, 2012.
    • Downey, Gary L. "Ideology and the clamshell identity: Organizational dilemmas in the anti-nuclear power movement." Social problems, (1986): 357-373.
    • Freiberger, P., and Swaine, M., Fire in the valley: the making of the personal computer. McGraw-Hill, 1999.
    • Gamson, WA., The strategy of social protest. Dorsey Press, 1975.
    • Gladwell, M., David and goliath: underdogs, misfits, and the art of battling giants. Little Brown and Co., 2013.
    • Gladwell, M., "How David beats Goliath," The New Yorker, May 11, 2009.
    • Goodell, Jeff. "Steve Jobs: The Rolling Stone Interview." Rolling Stone, 3 (2003).
    • Goodwin J., and Jasper, J., (eds.), The Social movement reader. Blackwell, 2003.
    • Hunt, S., Benford, R., and Snow, D., "Identity fields: framing processes and the
      social construction of movement identities." New social movements: from ideology to identity (1994): 185-208.
    • Isaacson, W., Steve Jobs. Simon Schuster, 2011.
    • Johnson, B., "Ten years after '1984': The commercial and the product that changed advertising." Advertising Age, January 10, 1994.
    • Kim, J., Eylon, P., Goethals, G., Markus, M., and Hindle, S., "Rooting for (and then abandoning) the underdog," Journal of applied social psychology, (2008): 38(10), 2550-2573.
    • Linzmayer, O.W., Apple confidential 2.0: the definitive history of the world’s most colorful company. No Starch Press, 2004.
    • Markoff, J., What the dormouse said: how the sixties counterculture shaped the personal computer industry. Penguin, 2005.
    • Mauss, A., Social problems as social movements. J. B. Lippincott, 1975.
    • Meyer, D. and Whittier, N., "Social movement spillover." Social problems, (1994): 277-298.
    • Miller, F., "The end of SDS and the emergence of weatherman: demise through success." In J. Freeman and V. Johnson, (Eds.), Waves of protest: social movements since the sixties, (pp. 303-324). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 1999.
    • Morgan, A., Overthrow: 10 ways to tell a challenger story. PHD, 2012.
    • Morgan, A., Eating the big fish: how challenger brands can compete against brand leaders. Wiley, 2009.
    • Moritz, M., "The updated book off jobs." Time magazine, January 3, 1983.
    • Moyer, B., Doing democracy: The MAP model for organizing social movements. New Society Publishers, 2001.
    • Mumford, L., The myth of the machine: techniques and human development. Harcourt, Brace and World, 1967.
    • Myers, F., Hippies and hobbyists: the shaping of the personal computer revolution, 2006.
    • Nudd, T., "Apple's 'get a Mac,' the complete campaign, Hodgman and Long, ad characters for the ages." Adweek, April 13, 2011.
    • Polletta, F., and Jasper, J., "Collective identity and social movements." Annual review of sociology, (2001): 283-305.
    • Roszak, T., From satori to silicon valley: San francisco and the American counterculture. Don't Call It Frisco Press, 1986.
    • Sawyers, T., and Meyer, D., "Missed opportunities: social movement abeyance and public policy." Social problems, (1999): 187-206.
    • Segall, K., Insanely simple: the obsession that drives Apple's success. Penguin, 2012.
    • Seippel, O., "From mobilization to institutionalization? The case of Norwegian environmentalism." Acta sociologica, 44.2 (2001): 123-137.
    • Siltanen, R., "The Real Story Behind Apple's 'Think Different' Campaign." Forbes, December 14, 2011.
    • Snow, D., et al. "Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation." American sociological review, (1986): 464-481.
    • Snow, D., et al. "Master frames and cycles of protest." Frontiers in social movement theory (1992): 133-155.
    • Stein, Sarah R. "The “1984” Macintosh ad: cinematic icons and constitutive rhetoric in the launch of a new machine." Quarterly journal of speech, 88.2 (2002): 169-192.
    • Sullivan, L., Hey, Whipple, Squeeze This: The Classic Guide to Creating Great Ads. 4th edition. Wiley, 2012.
    • Taylor, Verta. "Social movement continuity: The women's movement in abeyance." American sociological review, (1989): 761-775.
    • Tilly, C., From mobilization to revolution. Random House, 1978.
    • Vandello, J., Goldschmied, N., and Richards, D., "The appeal of the underdog." Personality and social psychology bulletin, (2007): 33, 1603-1616.
    • Wieviorka, M., "The resurgence of social movements." Journal of Conflictology, 3.2 (2012).
    • Wolf, G., "Steve Jobs: The next insanely great thing." Wired magazine, 1996.
    • Young, Jeffrey S., and Simon, W., iCon: Steve Jobs, the greatest second act in the history of business. Wiley, 2005.
    robert graup

    Thursday, July 18, 2013

    Acura "Made for Mankind": Hey that ad seems familiar, which is a good thing

    "There is no such thing as a new idea. It is impossible. We simply take a lot of old ideas and put them into a sort of mental kaleidoscope. We give them a turn and they make new and curious combinations. We keep on turning and making new combinations indefinitely; but they are the same old pieces of colored glass that have been in use through all the ages."                                                                                      - Mark Twain
    Like many businesses, advertising constantly remixes, rearranges, reworks, reuses and recycles things.  Sometimes this amounts to taking ideas created but rejected by one client and directly applying it to another client.  Sometimes this means taking bits and pieces from many different projects, our own or other's, and tweaking it for a second client.  It's a little bit like jazz improv or rap sampling.

    It's not about copying or stealing other's ideas. Great advertisers, like great improvisers, consider the rules, the conventions, then figure out ways to use them to a brand's advantage. They take risks and can often be disruptive.  

     We often use the history of an idea to sell a new ad: "It's a combo of Apple's 1984 plus Wendy's Where's the Beef," we cleverly explain.  Or, it's "Budweiser's Frogs meets Coke's Mean Joe Greene "Hey Kid, Catch."

     So, often when we see new ads we like to play the Evolution Game. Which is sort of a Rorschach test where we try and interpret the influences and origins of ads.

    Recently, I've been playing this game for Mullen's new Acura campaign, "Made for Mankind."

    As Adweek describes it:
    Over sparse piano notes and a series of slow-motion images, a female voice talks slowly about how "man is a determined creature" who has an "inherent calling to seek ... push ... improve ... transcend." The images include a man climbing a fir tree, a woman dancing and an astronaut floating in space.
    Not until 37 seconds into the 60-second ad does a car appear, although it then remains on screen until the end, when the voiceover veers into more typical car fare: "If your quest is to build the world's smartest luxury SUV for mankind, you must hold yourself to the standard of mankind." The only screen copy appears in the final seconds: "The extremely new 2014 MDX. Made for mankind."
    To play the Evolution Game you first look at those directly involved in making the ad: the director, ad creatives, editors, etc.  In this case, you can see the hand of Director Martin De Thurah.  After the Circle, an online magazine, says that De Thurah, "has a very identifiable video-style, involving in a clean and simple Scandinavian look but yet with a strong mysterious almost mystical side." "The abstract space I had in paintings," De Thurah says, "is something I try to bring along to describe an emotional space (in my films)." Here's De Thurah's work for Thomson Holidays:

    You can definitely see De Thurah's "strong mysterious" point of view in the Acura work.

    Next, Mullen CCO Mark Wenneker's 2003 Saturn ad, "Sheet Metal," which also doesn't show a car until the very end. Instead, the ad features people doing driving-type actions, but without vehicles. These scenes are accompanied by a simple voice over that softly explains that, at Saturn, “When we design our cars, we don’t see sheet metal. We see the people who may one day drive them.”

    (Yeah, when I squint, I can also see pieces of ECD Tim Vaccarino's VW "Milky Way" ad and perhaps some of his Hummer work at Modernista!—the beauty of the Evolution Game is that you can add and delete references as you see them.)

    While there's nothing specific I can point to, American Honda's CMO, Mike Accavitti, certainly helped drive the new ads.  "We want to drive more emotion into our advertising," he said.  And as the director of Dodge racing in the early 2000's, he certainly knows a thing or two about how NASCAR created such a strong emotional bond with its fans.

    So, the lineage of the new Acura campaign looks pretty clear from the past work of those directly involved. For the next part of the Evolution Game, you look for indirect influences, start matching other ads that remind you of this one, either through similar imagery, tonality or messaging. Here I see three influences.
    1. Hill Holliday's 1989 Infiniti work.  Don Easdon and Bill Heater's infamous "Rock and Trees" work for Infiniti is the car campaign everyone thinks of when it comes to not showing the product.  The campaign sought to present Infiniti as the result of Japan's unique culture and sensibility in the same way that VW uses "German engineering."
    1. Chiat/Day's 1987 Nissan work.  Their first work for Nissan ended with the tag, "Built for the Human Race."  ECD Rob Schwartz said that is showed that "a Japanese product can be emotional.  Toyota was relentlessly selling on quality.  Honda was selling on smart features.  What parking space is open for Nissan? A more human approach." (Automotive News, 5/19/08)
    1. DraftFCB's 2006 Dow campaign. Dominated by images of people, Dow's ads describe what it called a crucial but overlooked "human element" of chemistry—an interconnection of chemicals, nature, and the human spirit. It says nothing about Dow itself, other than to display the company's red diamond logo at the very end. The voice over by Creative Director John Claxton fits perfectly. 

    Of course, “user experience design” (UX) and “user-centered design” (UCD) are all about making things fit mankind, not forcing mankind to fit to the design.  And other brands have tried to own that space, e.g., Samsung Galaxy claims to be "Inspired by Nature. Designed for Humans." Thus, there are a lot of cues out there that remind us of the importance of starting with the way people actually interact and use their products.

    That's the Evolution Game.  But does the fact that you can picture antecedents of the Acura campaign diminish the emotional impact of the work in any way?

    It turns out that the answer is "no."  In fact, research has shown that feeling as if "I've seen that before" makes us more predisposed to like that thing. 
    • Mere-Exposure.  In a series of studies in the 1960s, Robert Zajonc flashed random images in front of his subjects—Chinese characters, faces and geometric figures. When asked which images they liked the most, the subjects picked the ones they saw the most. He coined this as the mere exposure effect: the more exposure we have to a stimulus, the more we are apt to like it. The effect results from exposure to a stimulus, even without conscious deliberation of that stimulus. 
    • The Gestalt Principle of Similarity states "all else being equal, perception lends itself to seeing stimuli that physically resemble each other as part of the same object, and stimuli that are different as part of a different object." So objects that share visual characteristics such as size, shape, texture, color, and orientation are perceived as a group or belonging together.  And if we like one part of the object, we tend to like the entire object.
    • The Representativeness Heuristic is a rule of thumb we use to estimate the likelihood of an event by comparing it to a prototype that already exists in our minds. Our prototype is what we think is the most relevant or typical example of a particular event or object. The representativeness heuristic was first described by psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman during the 1970s. Like other heuristics, making judgments based upon representativeness is intended to work as a type of mental shortcut, allowing us to make decisions quickly.  If we like the representative prototype, we typically like other examples of it.
    • Brand Familiarity automatically produces more favorable evaluations of a brand (Janiszewski; Holden). It has been shown that familiar ideas are perceived as more important and relevant, which makes you more likely to spend more effort processing an idea with a familiar theme and, hence, any related messages. Furthermore, the familiar requires less effort to process than the unfamiliar increasing the likelihood even more that consumers will process the brand-related message.
    • The meta-cognitive experience of the ease or difficulty with which new information is processed, referred to as Processing Fluency, has been shown to influence a wide range of human judgments including judgments of truth and preference (Cho; Lee). According to this model, increasing exposure to something enhances the ease with which consumers recognize and process it. In turn, this increased perceptual fluency leads to consumers having more favorable attitudes toward that thing.

    "We know there is huge power in a brand, and we need a stronger brand to be able to sell more vehicles," says Gary Robinson, manager of Acura's national advertising and brand. "It's a critical element that we are focused on. It's our goal to make MDX part of the conversation."  By taking a somewhat familiar idea and riffing on it, Mullen and Acura have done just that.

    "Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank" and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind."
    - Deep Thoughts by Jack Handy

    Additional Sources
    • Attneave, Fred. "Dimensions of similarity." The American Journal of Psychology 63.4 (1950): 516-556.
    • Bornstein, Robert F., and Paul R. D'Agostino. "Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63.4 (1992): 545.
    • Bower, Gordon H., Sharon Thompson-Schill, and Endel Tulving. "Reducing retroactive interference: an interference analysis." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20.1 (1994): 51.
    • Campbell, Margaret C., and Kevin Lane Keller. "Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects." Journal of Consumer Research 30.2 (2003): 292-304.
    • Cho, Hyejeung, and Norbert Schwarz. "If I don't understand it, it must be new: Processing fluency and perceived product innovativeness." Advances in Consumer Research 33 (2006): 319.
    • Collins, Allan M., and Elizabeth F. Loftus. "A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing." Psychological Review 82.6 (1975): 407.
    • Elio, Renee, and John R. Anderson. "The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7.6 (1981): 397.
    • Fang, Xiang, Surendra Singh, and Rohini Ahluwalia. "An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect." Journal of Consumer Research 34.1 (2007): 97-103.
    • Garcia-Marques, Teresa, and Diane M. Mackie. "The feeling of familiarity as a regulator of persuasive processing." Social Cognition, Vol. 19, No. 1, (2001), pp. 9-34.
    • Grimes, Anthony, and Philip J. Kitchen. "Researching mere exposure effects to advertising-Theoretical foundations and methodological implications." International Journal of Market Research 49.2 (2007): 191-219.
    • Holden, Stephen JS, and Richard J. Lutz. "Ask not what the brand can evoke; ask what can evoke the brand." Advances in Consumer Research 19.1 (1992): 101-107.
    • Holden, Stephen JS, and Marc Vanhuele. "Know the name, forget the exposure: Brand familiarity versus memory of exposure context." Psychology and Marketing 16.6 (1999): 479-496.
    • Janiszewski, Chris. "Preattentive mere exposure effects." Journal of Consumer Research (1993): 376-392.
    • Johnson, Eric J., and J. Edward Russo. "Product familiarity and learning new information." Journal of Consumer Research (1984): 542-550.
    • Johnson-Laird, Philip N. "How jazz musicians improvise." Music Perception 19.3 (2002): 415-442.
    • Kahneman, Daniel, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky, eds. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, 1982.
    • Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan, 2011.
    • Keller, Kevin Lane. "Memory factors in advertising: The effect of advertising retrieval cues on brand evaluations." Journal of Consumer Research (1987): 316-333.
    • Kent, Robert J., and Chris T. Allen. "Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: the role of brand familiarity." The Journal of Marketing (1994): 97-105.
    • Lee, Angela, and Aparna Labroo. "The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation." Available at SSRN 967768 (2003).
    • Machleit, Karen A., and R. Dale Wilson. "Emotional feelings and attitude toward the advertisement: The roles of brand familiarity and repetition." Journal of Advertising 17.3 (1988): 27-35.
    • Meyers-Levy, Joan. "The influence of a brand name's association set size and word frequency on brand memory." Journal of Consumer Research (1989): 197-207.
    • Reber, Rolf, Norbert Schwarz, and Piotr Winkielman. "Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?." Personality and Social Psychology Review 8.4 (2004): 364-382.
    • Rosenberg, M. J. "Hedonism, inauthenticity, and other goads towards expansion of a consistency theory." In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & R. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 73–111).
    • Chicago: Rand McNally, (1968).
    • Tversky, Amos. "Features of similarity." Psychological Review 84.4 (1977): 327.
    • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. "Probabilistic reasoning." Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science (1993): 43-68.
    • Ye, Gewei, and W. Fred Van Raaij. "What inhibits the mere-exposure effect: Recollection or familiarity?." Journal of Economic Psychology 18.6 (1997): 629-648.
    • Zack, Michael H. "Jazz improvisation and organizing: Once more from the top." Organization Science 11.2 (2000): 227-234.
    • Zajonc, Robert B. "Attitudinal effects of mere exposure." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9.2 (1968): 1.
    • Zinkhan, George M., and Aydin Muderrisoglu. "Involvement, familiarity, cognitive differentiation, and advertising recall: a test of convergent and discriminant validity." Advances in Consumer Research 12.1 (1985): 356-360.
    robert graup

    Wednesday, May 22, 2013

    The iPhone "Photos Every Day" Ad: The Death of the Kodak Moment, the Rise of the iPhone Memento.

    "The laughter and the tears
    The shadows of misty yesteryears
    The good times and the bad you've seen
    And all the others in between
    Remember, do you remember
    The times of your life.
    " Paul Anka
    When we went on our honeymoon in 1992, my wife and I went overboard and took a dozen or so rolls of 35 mm film. At 36 exposures a roll, we felt comfortable that we'd capture all our "Kodak moments." After we finished each roll, we carefully hid them in our suitcase, worrying that we'd somehow misplace them along the way.  We got back home, carefully placed each in a separate envelope at our photography store, checked off our desired options (2 copies, 3x5, glossy finish, no borders) labelled them with our names and address and waited the week for them to be developed. Going through the developed photos was such a powerful rush of anticipation. Was there a great photo in the bunch?  A keeper?  Something that captured what Cartier-Bresson called "the decisive moment"; that André Bazin said "embalms time": photos that so captured the moment as to act as a permanent placeholder of our memories?

    These four, Bellagio on Lake Como, the Piazza Del Campo in Siena, Giambologna's turkey sculpture in Florence and the canals of Venice,continue to bring me back so strongly to those moments, that trip in Italy.
    Years later, I listened to Jeff Goodby as he voiced-over a brand video for Nikon:
    "A photograph isn't good merely because of its lighting or composition, but because of its emotion. The best photographs are pieces of frozen time.  They preserve a single, unrecoverable moment.  They record a world in which youth is forever, life is eternal, emotions are never changing, and smiles are sustained beyond the power of human endurance."
    When I look through my honeymoon photo album, I recognize that truth.
    So, I really enjoyed the new Apple iPhone 5 ad, "Photos Every Day."  With a quiet piano playing, the 60-second ad shows scene after scene of people using their iPhones to take photos—of their friends, of their family, of nature, of themselves.  It reminds me of the early iPod and iPhone ads that filled our emotional wells with simple movement and music.


    We really like taking pictures. It’s estimated that since the earliest known surviving photograph was created in 1825 by Nicéphore Niépce, mankind has taken 3.8 trillion photos.

    On average more than 350 million photos were uploaded every day to Facebook between October and December 2012; 240 billion have been uploaded in total.

    That's a lot of photos.

    But how many of those photos do we actually look at? Or at least look twice at?

    My honeymoon photo album contains only 75 of the 450+ photos we took. We look through them about once a year. My kids have looked at them. Maybe my mother-in-law. We've probably shown them to friends a few times over the years. But no one else.

    Who else would really enjoy them as we have?

    And yet 58 photos are uploaded to Instragram every second of the day.  Are they cherished? Looked back upon? How many capture that decisive moment? 

    Louie CK joked about this in a recent HBO special.


    Damon Brown (2013) worries that we are entering an age where capturing the highlights of our lives has taken precedence over actually enjoying those very same moments.

    Writing in the Harvard Business Review, Daniel Gulati explains that the reason we're so obsessed with saving moments today instead of savoring them is, in part, because we're wired to hoard: "We like to count our victories, and most of all, we love saying that we've 'been there, done that.' Social media platforms create hooks such as follower counts and virtual photo albums that make our experiences seem more tangible, giving us a false feeling of accumulation. It's as if our most important experiences are now collectible."

    Reminds me of George Carlin's 1981 riff on stuff.


    Camera phones are so ubiquitous and easy to use that we're moved to document and collect every moment of our lives.  "Whereas parents and/or children used to sit on the couch together flipping through photo albums," says Van Dijck (2008), "most teenagers consider their pictures to be temporary reminders rather than permanent keepsakes. Cameraphone photography gives rise to a cultural form reminiscent of the old-fashioned postcard: snapshots with a few words attached that are mostly valued as ritual signs of (re)connection. Like postcards, cameraphone pictures are meant to be thrown away after they are received."

    (Snapchat, a mobile phone app, actually lets users take photos or short videos and then decide how long they will be visible to the recipient. After a maximum of 10 seconds, the images disappear forever.)

    However, a whole host of researchers, (Vitualno, 2011; Murray, 2008; Van Dijck, 2008; Kindleberg, 2008; and Van House, 2005, 2006) see the reasons for taking photos shifting with the explosion of smartphones and tablets. While we still take photos as a way of recording, collecting and sharing experiences, and to express a personal aesthetic, we also take pictures for other reasons, key amongst them:

    Creating and Maintaining Social Relationships
    Photos have become very important in social relationships. Emailing or posting photos to social networks is a way of keeping up on one another’s lives. Online photo sharing supplements in-person interactions, accruing social capital and clout to those who post pictures that are liked by others in a group. The content of photos can show who is also part of the group.  Instagram has given teenagers "something to talk about amongst themselves, providing them with yet one more mechanism for sharing their emotional experience and exchanging objects of personal significance." (Harper et al, 2003)

    Self-presentation is about influencing others’ view of oneself; for example, through sharing specific self-portraits, pictures of one’s friends, possessions, personal space, and so on.  Users can manage the impressions others form of them more easily through this medium than in face-to-face interactions.  "We're no longer taking photos to remember," says USA Today's Katrina Trinko, "but to refashion public perception. Photos, after all, can be used to manipulate, and to tell the story we want told about our lives, one stylish shot at a time."  Easy to use photo editing mobile phone apps (e.g., Photoshop Express, Phototreats, ColorSplash, moreBeaute) allow users to tweak phones purely on image quality factors (such as blurriness, exposure and color balance), to crop parts of a photo or add special effects.

    According to Van Dijck, "Digital photography is part of a larger transformation in which the self becomes the center of a virtual universe made up of informational and spatial flows; individuals articulate their identity as social beings not only by taking and storing photographs to document their lives, but by participating in communal photographic exchanges that mark their identity as interactive producers and consumers of culture."

    This transformation represents a shift from sharing memories to a sharing of experiences. We are no longer interested in the special/rarefied/decisive moment but instead have moved to a sense of a
    fleeting immediacy that the camera phone simply records.  Because of their abundance, we've gone from moments to momentary.

    The magic of the Kodak moment has become the banality of the iPhone memento.

    • Barthes, R., Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Hill and Wang, New York, 1981.
    • Bazin, A., What Is Cinema?, trans. Hugh Gray. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
    • Bourdieu, P., Photography: A Middle-brow Art. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, reprinted 1996, (1965).
    • Brown, D., Our Virtual Shadow: Why We Are Obsessed with Documenting Our Lives
      Online," TED Books, 2013.
    • Burke, M., Kraut, R., and Marlow, C., "Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users." In Proceedings of the annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 571-580, 2011.
    • Cartier-Bresson, H., The Decisive Moment, Simon and Schuster, 1952.
    • Davies, J., "Display, identity and the everyday: self-presentation through online image sharing. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education, 28:4, 549-564, 2007.
    • Freeman-Greene, S., "So busy taking pictures for posterity, we miss the magic of the moment," Sydney Morning Herald, March 23, 2010.
    • Goggin, G., "On mobile photography: camera phones, moblogging and new visual cultures," In, Cell phone Culture: Mobile Technology of Everyday Life. London: Routledge, 2006.
    • Gulotta, R., Faste, H., and Mankoff, J., "Curation, provocation, and digital identity: risks and motivations for sharing provocative images online," In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 387-390, 2012.
    • Gye, L., "Picture this: the impact of mobile camera phones on personal photographic practices," Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 21:2, 279-288, 2007
    • Harper, R., and Taylor, A., "The gift of the gab?: a design oriented sociology of young people’s use of mobiles," Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12, 267-296, 2003.
    • Hochman, N., and Schwartz, R., "Visualizing Instagram: tracing cultural visual rhythms," Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
    • Kindberg, T., Spasojevic, M., Fleck, R., and Sellen, A., "I saw this and thought of you: some social uses of camera phones," Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005),  ACM Press, 2005.
    • Kindberg, T., Spasojevic, M., Fleck, R., and Sellen, A., "The ubiquitous camera: An in-depth study of camera phone use." Pervasive Computing, IEEE 4:2, 42-50, 2005.
    • Liechti, O., and Ichikawa, T., "A digital photography framework enabling affective awareness in home communication," Personal and Ubiquitous Computing  4:1, 232–9, 2000.
    • Manjoo, F., "All I wanna do is zoom zoom zoom zoom," Slate, January 27, 2009.
    • Manovich, L., The Language of New Media, MIT Press, 2001.
    • Murray, S., "Digital images, photo-sharing, and our shifting notions of everyday aesthetics." Journal of Visual Culture 7:2, 147-163, 2008.
    • O’Brien, M., "Consuming talk: youth culture and the mobile phone," Dissertation, National University of Ireland Maynooth, 2010.
    • Okabe, D., “Emergent social practices, situations and relations through everyday camera phone use,” Proceedings International Conference on Mobile Communications and Social Change, 1–19, 2004.
    • Palmer, D., "Emotional archives: online photo sharing and the cultivation of the self," Photographies, 3:2, 155 – 171, 2010.
    • Papacharissi, Z., (ed), A Networked Self, Routledge, 2011.
    • Rainie, L., Brenner, J., and Purcell, K.,  Photos and Videos as Social Currency Online," PEW, 2012.
    • Rantavuo, H., Connecting photos: A qualitative study of cameraphone photo use. University of Art and Design Helsinki, 2008.
    • Rivière, C., "Mobile camera phones: a new form of 'being together' in daily interpersonal communication." Mobile Communications. Springer London, 167-185, 2005.
    • Schwarz, O., "Subjectual Visibility and the Negotiated Panopticon: on the Visibility-Economy of Online Digital Photography." 2011.
    • Schiano, D., Chen, C., and Isaacs, E., "How teens take, view, share, and store photos," Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Co-operative Work, ACM, 2002.
    • Slater, D., "Domestic photography and digital culture," in Martin Lister (ed.) The Photographic Image in Digital Culture, 129–46, Routledge, 1995.
    • Sontag, S., On Photography. Picador USA; Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977.
    • Stelmaszewska, H., Fields, B., and Blandford, A., "Camera phone use in social context," In Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction. 2, 2006.
    • Stricland, S., "Art photography: When 'reality isn't good enough,'" CNN, August 18, 2012.
    • Van Dijck, J., "Digital photography: communication, identity, memory." Visual Communication 7.1, 57-76, 2008.
    • Van House, N., Davis, M., Takhteyev, Y., Ames, M., and Finn, M. "The social uses of personal photography: methods for projecting future imaging applications," University of California, Berkeley, Working Papers, 3, 2004.
    • Van House, N., and Davis, M., "The social life of cameraphone images," Proceedings of the Pervasive Image Capture and Sharing: New Social Practices and Implications for Technology Workshop at the Seventh International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 2005.
    • Van House, N., Davis, M., Ames, M., Finn, M. and Viswanathan, V., "The uses of personal networked digital imaging: an empirical study of cameraphone photos and sharing." In: Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, 2005.
    • Van House, N., "Distant closeness: Cameraphones and public image sharing," International Conference of Ubiquitous Computing Workshop. 2006.
    • Vitulano, R., "Creating cellular vision: cell phone photography and the (shifting) photographic eye," The McMaster Journal of Communication 8:1, 10, 2013.

    robert graup

    Thursday, May 2, 2013

    Presumed Dead, Brand Consistency Is Very Much Alive. The Cisco Example.

    The first rule I learned in advertising was that people follow a typical decision process when they buy products: if you make them aware of a product they need, then they will eventually buy it (i.e., the "purchase funnel.")

    The best way to generate that awareness was through TV.

    The more you shouted, over the voices of others, the more likely you'd get purchase. (We were confident that this meant media plans with at least 75% reach, 5+ frequency.)

    Of course, you couldn't just shout anything. The message had to be clear, unique, relevant and likable. And consistent. Above all, consistent.

    Then it turned out that people hated ads. They didn't trust them. Skipped them if possible (90% of those surveyed back in 2005 said they "skipped all or most commercials when they watched a show played back on DVR").

    We said, don't shove things and yell at people, you need to create things that draw them in. Things that make them want to come learn/see/engage more. Listen. Invite. Give. Participate. Experience. Converse.

    So, we updated and created new models of purchasing, like David Edelman's Consumer Decision Journey (“Branding in the Digital Age – You’re Spending Your Money in the Wrong Places,” 2010) that said that the purchase process doesn’t end at the point of sale but instead is the beginning of a “loyalty loop” where consumers enter into a dialog with the brand and share their experiences with others online. Companies that succeed with this model shifted away from paid media to invest heavily in creating strong online experiences that promote advocacy and spread product reviews.

    We grooved to John Grant's (The Brand Innovation Manifesto, 2006) proposal that we visualize brands as “clusters of strategic cultural ideas.” Like atoms, these ideas combine to form molecular structures to which new ideas can be added and old ideas can be removed—all in order to keep pace with cultural change.
    We went even bigger with Sue Elms of Millward Brown ("Integrated Planning: Standing Out in the Cloud," 2011) suggesting that the world is far more complex than a mere loop. Instead it might be better to think of our potential and current customers existing in a cloud of turbulent and sometimes conflicting influences. Instead of targeting people at specific points on the path to purchase – be it funnel or loop – we need to plan for “meaningful coincidences.” The objective of each coincidence is to help create a center of gravity around a brand based on people’s impressions accumulated over time.

    The rationale behind these new models is that power has shifted from advertiser to consumer According to Assumsen:
    "(E)mpowered by the internet, consumers and other stakeholders have now become potentially more active (co-)authors, agenda setters and access providers when it comes to brand manifestations. They are therefore able to contribute to the co-creation of brand meaning at a previously unreachable level since the internet, and related technologies, provide them with an unprecedented availability of resources to access, produce and/or distribute brand manifestations themselves; thus supporting the contention that consumers – and other stakeholders – have “moved out of the audience and onto the stage.” Beyond traditional word-of-mouth, they now have access to a broad variety of user-generated content platforms such as blogs and microblogs, social networking sites, wikis, and product review or video sharing sites. All these platforms potentially allow their users not only to enrich their own experience of a brand but also, for example, to express an opinion about it and therefore create a manifestation of the brand that can be experienced by others."
    And what happened to "consistency"?

    Dead said the experts.

    According to Gareth Kay (2007) "The day of the all powerful single idea is gone. Culture expects stories to be told with depth, richness and nuance. Doing the same thing at every point of contact will bore people. And success does not come through being boring. Our focus on doing one thing makes marketing communication more often than not one of the most boring forms of culture there is today."
    In fact, a survey among marketers in 2011 found that a 73% majority believe that “the days of strategic consistency are over; it’s all about inspiration and engagement.”

    Grant says we can drop consistency completely as long as the brand’s point of view is coherent across media. Mullen's Edward Boches proclaims that in a world where media space is infinite, when everyone’s a creator and broadcaster, "I’m not sure consistency – at least in terms of messages and a look – even matters anymore. It’s more important to be present, visible, searchable and useful."

    Of course, the truth is that in a world where 4 out of 5 multitask while watching TV, brands need a certain level of consistency now more than ever.

    One brand that has been incredibly consistent is Cisco Systems.  Cisco started like a Shakespearean romance: a couple separated by external forces figure out a way to connect. In this case, Leonard Bosack and Sandy Lerner connected two detached computer networks located in two different buildings on Stanford's campus using router technology. That was back in 1984. Since then, the brand message has continued to focus on one thing: Connections (via the Internet).

    The "Cisco Brand Roadmap," written for Cisco's first TV campaign, reads:

    As you can see below from Cisco CEO John Chambers quotes over time, the only thing that has changed over the years is what was being connected (everything) and how quickly (very fast) those connections were being made:
    1998: "The Internet will change how people live, work, play and learn. The Industrial Revolution brought together people with machines in factories, and the Internet revolution will bring together people with knowledge and information in virtual companies. And it will have every bit as much impact on society as the Industrial Revolution. It will promote globalization at an incredible pace. But instead of happening over 100 years, like the Industrial Revolution, it will happen over 7 years.''
    2012: "A decade ago, when Cisco helped connect millions of devices to the Internet, we proclaimed we were in the midst of an “Internet Revolution.” We were wrong. What we witnessed at the onset of the 21st Century, as remarkable as it was, was merely a prelude. While still in the distance, we are now seeing what the internet is delivering: an age of information and freedom that we could never fathom just 10 short years ago. We are rapidly heading into a new era that will not be measured by the number of users, devices, or connections. What is changing the world, profoundly, is the value those connections make possible. When we connected the first 500 million devices to the internet, it seemed to reshape our lives. But now we are on the cusp of a transformation that connects everything to the internet. Highways, buildings, farms, satellites, solar panels, cars, milk cartons, cows…everything."
    Since the beginning, there have been three advertising agencies that have created brand campaigns for Cisco: GMO (the ex-Chiat/Day San Francisco office, later morphing into Hill Holliday) until 2002; Ogilvy West, 2002-2012; Goodby, Silverstein Partners, 2012 - present.  The three anthem ads that each agency produced all communicate the idea of connections.

    "Empowering the Internet Generation" (1998)

    "The Human Network" (2004)

    "Tomorrow Starts Here" (2012)

    Of course, one of the big differences between the original campaign and the more recent one is the world's familiarity with Cisco.  Back in the mid 1990's, beyond a small circle of IT professionals, no one even knew Cisco existed. To expand the audience, GMO had to demystify the technology, communicating the power of the Internet and Cisco as the Internet leader.  They needed to cement a simple equation in people’s minds: Internet = Cisco. Cisco = Internet.

    To do that, they challenged customers: “Are you ready?

    If you were, Cisco would take you to a new world, dramatically changing the way we all live, work, play and learn. Everyone was invited to come along. Millions of people around the world did just that.

    As Mike Massaro, who led Cisco's account told me, unlike later campaigns, the original was able to use a velvet hammer approach: combining a honest, responsive, confident, and human brand personality with a bit of fear and urgency.

    While the brand message that Cisco has promised has remained constant, the width and depth of the connections that Cisco is using to drive its brand has changed dramatically.  Though Cisco is a B2B brand, marketing takes advantage of all the tools normally executed by a B2C brand.

    Witness these media additions:

    2004: Cisco's mobile showcase, Network on Wheels (NOW) van program began roaming the world in four 25-foot-long, high-tech buses

    2005: launched the first external blog.

    2006: opened private islands in the virtual realm Second Life.

    2007: started using video for press releases and blogs.

    2007: opened a YouTube channel.

    2008: initiated a Twitter account.

    2008: gamified, launching Cisco Edge Quest, an online game to introduce its new ASR 1000 Series routers.

    2009: opened a Facebook page.

    Flickr, Google+, LinkedIn, Pinterest, and other tools that allow Cisco to connect have also been added. And, of course, all of these marketing tactics have been tied together with partner and developer marketing. 

    LaSandra Brill, the head of Cisco's social media efforts, describes the additions as allowing Cisco to move from short-term campaigns that fulfill immediate, functional needs to building meaningful relationships that create life-long allegiances.
    This includes a global event strategy that aims to educate partners and customers.  For example, Cisco Live! 2012 in London welcomed almost 7,000 customers, partners, analysts, journalists, Cisco speakers, hosts and executives from more than 70 countries. Rather than just being a single point program, the event is extended beyond the on-site experience using online virtual capabilities.

    Looking across these various programs, you can observe that there isn't a single, monotone execution of the brand.  Rather, there are recognizable patterns and stories told.  There is a recognition that the consumer is an active part of the brand, but it's a consistent brand focused around the idea of connecting everything, anywhere and everywhere, and thus empowering people in ways we never imagined.

    That first Cisco Brand Roadmap said: "The world is changing by the moment and we believe our role is to impact those changes positively. Every piece of communication should leave people feeling energized and empowered. Every piece of communication should feel like we’re bringing the world closer together. Anything less is unacceptable."

    And it is here that we see the mistake that the consistency killers made.  Consistency was never about creating generic clones.  It was never about over-simplification. It was never about executing an idea in single, uniform fashion.  It was always about the beauty of an idea.  One that was authentic to the product.  An idea that was allowed to unfold and evolve over time.  

    Back in 1995, the ad below asked, "Ever wonder who actually connects the core of the Internet together? The answer is Cisco Systems."

    It was then.  It still is today.   That's the beauty of a consistent idea.

    Additional Reading
    • Asmussen, B., Harridge-March, S., Occhiocupo, N., and Farquhar, J. "The multi-layered nature of the internet-based democratization of brand management," Journal of Business Research, 2012.
    • Barnes, M., "Evaluating Cisco’s Strategy: How Many Market Adjacencies Are Too Many?," Forrester Research, 2011.
    • Behrens, R. "Art, design and gestalt theory," Leonardo, 299-303, 1998.
    • Berthon, P., Holbrook, M., Hulbert, J., and Pitt, L. "Viewing brands in multiple dimensions. MIT Sloan Review, Winter 2007.
    • Berthon P., Pitt, L., and Campbell C. "Does brand meaning exist in similarity or singularity?," Journal of Business Research, 62:3, 356-361, 2009.
    • Bhalla, G. Collaboration and Co-creation: New Platforms for Marketing and Innovation. Springer Science, 2011.
    • Brown, S., Kozinets, R., and Sherry, J. “Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro-branding and the revival of brand meaning,” Journal of Marketing, 67:3, 19–33, 2003.
    • Campbell, M., and Keller, K. "Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects." Journal of Consumer Research, 30:2, 292-304, 2003.
    • Christodoulides, G. "Branding in the post-internet era," Marketing Theory, 9:1, 141-144, 2009.
    • da Silveira, C., Lages, C., and Simões, C. "Reconceptualizing brand identity in a dynamic environment," Journal of Business Research, 2011.
    • Durgee , J. "The co-creation of meaning between marketers and consumers," Advances in Consumer Research 31:1, 162 – 167, 2004.
    • Firat, A. and Dholakia, N. “Theoretical and philosophical implications of postmodern debates: Some challenges to modern marketing,” Marketing Theory, 6:2, 123–62, 2006.
    • Fisher, D., and Smith, S. "Co-creation is chaotic: What it means for marketing when no one has control," Marketing Theory, 11:3, 325-350, 2011.
    • Fournier, S. “Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research," Journal of Consumer Research, 24:4, 343–53, 1998.
    • Gregory, A. "Involving stakeholders in developing corporate brands: The communication dimension," Journal of Marketing Management, 23:1-2, 59–73, 2007.
    • Gyrd-Jones, R., and Kornum, N. "Managing the co-created brand: Value and cultural complementarity in online and offline multi‐stakeholder ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, 2012.
    • Hatch, M., and Schultz, M. "Toward a theory of brand co-creation with implications for brand governance," Journal of Brand Management, 17:8, 590-604, 2010.
    • Hamel, G., and Prahalad, C. "Strategic intent," Harvard Business Review, 83:7, 148-161, 2005.
    • Holt, D. and Cameron, D. Cultural Strategy: Using Innovative Ideologies to Build Breakthrough Brands. Oxford. Oxford University Press, 2010.
    • Jones, R. "Five ways branding is changing," Journal of Brand Management, 20:2, 77-79, 2012.
    • McAlexander, J., Schouten, J., and Koenig, H. "Building brand community," The Journal of Marketing, 38-54, 2002.
    • Muniz Jr, A., and O’Guinn, T. "Brand community," Journal of Consumer Research, 27:4, 412-432, 2001.
    • Närvänen, E. "The brand as a cultural network hub: acknowledging multiple parties in branding," APA, 2011.
    • Payne , A., Storbacka, K., Frow, P. and Knox, S. "Co-creating brands: Diagnosing and designing the relationship experience," Journal of Business Research, 62:3, 379–389, 2009.
    • Pechmann, C., and Stewart, D. "Advertising repetition: A critical review of wearin and wearout." Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 11:1-2, 285-329, 1988.
    • Prahalad C. and Ramaswamy V. "Co-opting customer competence," Harvard Business Review, 78 (January/February): 79-87, 2000.
    • Shillum, M., "Brands as Patterns," Method, Inc., 2011.
    • Vargo S., and Lusch R. "Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing," Journal of Marketing, 68(1): 1–17, 2004.